Intelligence Rating: C

That Is A Complex Question

The meaning of age depends on temporal type. Temporal type has two values: pro-temporal and atemporal. All objects belong to at least one temporal type; complexity ocurrs when objects may be placed in both categories (SHARVY has shown that objects that seem to be of neither type may be made to belong to both types by inverting the manner in which the types are defined (but not the types themselves). For example, an object which belongs to neither type when the types are defined in terms of their properties will belong to both types when the types are defined in terms of what they are not. Note that only the method of definition changes, not the definitions themselves.) Let us consider some examples of temporal type:

Atemporal Type Objects

Note that photons and dead people are "everywhere they will ever be all at once," whereas you and I are everywhere we will ever be one step at a time. So you and I apparently are not atemporal.

Pro-temporal Type Objects

Note that temporal type objects are all of a type, which is to say the individual members lack identity; this is apparently not true of you and me.

Discussion

Let's now turn to our discussion of Sharvy.
Note that Sharvy seems to possess many essential properties of dead people, such as that he has a soul but not a job, and of photons, such as that he is brilliant and lights your way in the dark. In this respect, Sharvy would appear to be atemporal.
Now note that Sharvy shares characteristics with grains of sand, such as a constitutional inability to be dishonest or selfish, a lack of ego, and a fondness for orifices; likewise he resembles Fritos in that he is corny but in a good way.

Conclusion

Sharvy is both pro-temporal and atemporal, and the greater the precision with which the question of his age is examined, the greater the imprecision of our understanding of his atemporal aspects--his soul, brilliance, etc.

I Agree Not to Think This Was Dumb